current location：Home >生死狙击

伐木累

ONSIDE与T1晋级以韩国队伍为主的无畏契约第二阶段季后赛_我的网站

相亲才会赢

A |

Illustration: Liu Rui/GTChristopher Nolan's new film has attracted considerable attention from audiences and critics around the world. Particularly interesting is its reception in China, where the Beijing premiere provided the occasion for a conversation between Nolan and the Chinese political philosopher Zhong Shu.
We shall first consider some of the positive and negative appraisals of the film, before turning to its significance for Chinese viewers and, more broadly, to possible comparisons between the philosophical and cultural traditions of East and West. This commentary draws primarily on reviews by Emily Wilson in the London Review of Books and in The Atlantic, and Daniel Mendelsohn in the New York Review of Books, as well as on questions raised by Zhong Shu.
It should first be acknowledged that Nolan has produced an impressive action movie, condensing and abridging most of the major episodes of Odysseus' adventurous journey back to Ithaca. Avoiding digital technology based on artificial screens, he gives the story an unusually tangible quality.
The film also benefits from a distinguished cast, whose performances illuminate the different strands of the narrative as conceived by the director. At the same time, the viewer is invited to reconstruct the complex temporal layers of the epic, extending from the fall of Troy to Odysseus' homecoming (nostos), his reunion with Telemachus and Penelope, and the harsh punishment of the suitors.
Many objections concerning anachronisms in costumes and armor, the use of American English, details of the Mycenaean or Archaic periods, or the casting of particular characters seem unfair. Some degree of anachronism is inevitable, and the pursuit of historical or textual fidelity would ultimately be futile. Nolan was obliged to omit or substantially rework parts of the original narrative in order to fit it into a three-hour film. Some omissions are nevertheless regrettable -- notably the treatment of the Cyclops episode and Odysseus' descent into the Underworld, as well as the complete omission of the Phaeacian episode and his encounter with Nausicaa.
There are, however, more serious grounds for concern with regard to the central idea underlying Nolan's reinterpretation of the Odyssey. In his attempt to convey a modern moral message largely alien to Homer's world, Nolan presents an Odysseus who has surprisingly little in common with the "complicated" (polytropos) man depicted by the ancient poet. The ethical ambiguities of a shrewd and resourceful character, ready to deceive and to commit violence in pursuit of his ends, are largely absent from Matt Damon's Odysseus. Instead, we encounter a hero repeatedly tormented by guilt for atrocities perpetrated or condoned during the Trojan War and consequently seeking some form of atonement.
Zhong Shu is therefore justified in asking Nolan whether he intends to "Christianize" Odysseus. The filmmaker seems to have moved him, almost imperceptibly, from what anthropologists have described as a "shame culture" -- the world of Homer, in which honor and fame, as perceived by others, are of central importance -- to a "guilt culture," characterized by an internalized sense of responsibility and remorse for wrongdoing. This latter moral orientation emerges with classical Greek ethics, particularly with Socrates and Plato, and reaches its fullest expression in Christian and post-Christian conceptions of morality.
Nolan appears to believe that such a transition toward guilt follows naturally once we recognize the force of a commitment to "Zeus' law," particularly in the obligations of mutual hospitality (xenia). He connects these obligations with a version of the "Golden Rule," understood as a principle of reciprocal respect in our treatment of others.
This, however, is problematic as a construal of Homeric morals. Early variants of the Golden Rule can be found from the fifth century BC onwards in Democritus and Isocrates, and later in Epictetus and, of course, in the teachings of Jesus. More importantly, the moral conscience Nolan attributes to Odysseus not only "Christianizes" him; it arguably "Kantianizes" him as well. "Zeus' law" is presented almost as a universal proto-categorical imperative, something that could readily be endorsed by Kant. This differs significantly from the ancient injunction against hybris: the warning against excessive pride, the transgression of human limits, and the violation of the divine and cosmological order that we encounter throughout Homer's epics.
One may, of course, concede to Nolan the artistic right to create his own Odysseus: a depressed war veteran, conscious of the dangers of violating moral rules, and concerned with preserving the normative foundations of civilization. The difficulty lies elsewhere. Nolan's attempt to accommodate this new hero and his moral psychology within the narrative framework of the original Odyssey is not entirely successful. The result is a tension between the Homeric story the film seeks to reconstruct and the modern moral drama superimposed upon it. This tension, I believe, accounts for much of the film's weakness.
When we turn, however, to the horizon of the Chinese tradition, a more intriguing possibility emerges. The moral dimension of Nolan's Odysseus may be closer to certain aspects of Confucian thought than to the Homeric model. Confucian relational role ethics can be interpreted as encouraging a form of moral self-consciousness in which responsibility, integrity, and the cultivation of the self become increasingly internalized. In this qualified sense, one might speak of a movement from "shame" towards something resembling a "guilt" culture.
The Golden Rule is also prominent in Confucian teaching. Furthermore, the demand to examine and rectify one's conduct in accordance with yi (righteousness), while cultivating ren (benevolence or humaneness), can be understood as pointing toward a more inward and spiritual form of the Greek nostos: a return not simply to one's geographical home, but to one's moral center, situated within a network of relationships.
In addition, Nolan's relative downplaying of divine intervention, and his tendency to integrate the divine dimension into a more naturalistic moral order, may make his construal more congenial to the practical ethos of Chinese philosophy than to a worldview grounded explicitly in metaphysical theology.
There is, therefore, a certain paradox. Although Nolan's film may be criticized as an interpretation of Homer, its very misreading of the epic may enable it to contribute to a dialogue between East and West. By transforming Odysseus into a figure whose moral conscience combines Christian, Kantian, and perhaps unexpectedly Confucian elements, Nolan brings into contact traditions that otherwise belong to very different intellectual worlds. His Odyssey is not true to Homer's spirit. But precisely for this reason, it raises questions about how different civilizations understand responsibility, moral identity, the relation between the individual and the community, and, ultimately, the meaning of returning home.
The author is a Professor Emeritus of Philosophy with the National and Kapodistrian University of Athens and Secretary of the Center of Greek and Chinese Civilizations. [email protected]
。 Pacific Stage 2 入围赛已落下帷幕，最后两个季后赛席位尘埃落定。首场比赛由两支挑战者联赛战队展开对决，最终

ONSIDE GAMING 在一场三图鏖战中击败了

Sharper Esports。在第二场比赛中，

T1 以 2-0 的干净利落比分复仇

DetonatioN FocusMe，一雪小组赛落败之耻。以下是两场比赛的详细战报：ONSIDE GAMING 力克 Sharper 晋级季后赛ONSIDE 和 Sharper 在入围赛阶段均带着 2-1 的战绩进入了这场生死战。虽然 ONSIDE 在胜者组首轮败给了

KIWOOM DRX，但 Sharper 在落败于 KRX 的季后赛资格赛前，曾在胜者组连赢两场。这两支队伍显然都深谙自己的强项。

B | Sharper 在其选图 Ascent 上展现了统治力，而 ONSIDE 则在自己的选图 Haven 上占据主导。

C | 此前 Sharper 在对阵 KRX 的 1-2 失利中，曾以 14-12 在 Haven 上强行将比赛拖入决胜局。SP 凭借“贤者+零”的双哨兵阵容构建了极具压制力的进攻体系，以 10-2 进入下半场防守，令 ONG 束手无策。

D | 最终 13-2 的比分让这支泰国队伍带着巨大的势头进入了第二张地图。ONG 的 Haven 如同 SP 的 Ascent 一样，在前一天 2-0 战胜 FULL SENSE 时就已证明过强度。SP 试图调整阵容，放弃了原先的“夜露+霓虹”阵容，转而使用参考了 Gen.G 的“欧门+毒蝎+杀手”阵容。遗憾的是，这套阵容在进攻端并未奏效。

E | ONG 在防守端打出了 9-3 的半场领先。值得注意的是，队内新星 Xiesta 在这场比赛中仅是第四次使用非霓虹特工，而 Ray 则接过霓虹的重任。两人展现了极佳的默契，Xiesta 的菲尼克斯闪光弹完美地为 Ray 及其他队友创造了机会。

F | 在 13-5 拿下 Haven 后，双方进入决胜图 Breeze。

G | SP 坚持使用“海神+毒蝎+菲尼克斯+霓虹”的阵容，而 ONG 则进行了微调。ONG 借鉴了 NRG 的战术体系，由 Ray 使用海神，并搭配 K/O 与苏法两位先锋。Ray 在他首次使用海神的比赛中拿到了 ACE。SP 在进攻端拿下了 8 分，看似胜券在握。然而，ONG 连追 6 分抢回了比赛主动权。由于难以处理经济局，比赛被拖入加时，SP 依靠 NIZ 的“猎手大招”惊险扳平比分。尽管进入加时时 SP 士气高涨，但 ONG 表现得更加沉稳，最终以 14-12 险胜。Ray 是本系列赛表现最亮眼的选手，以 53 个击杀、1.22 的评分以及 9-2 的首杀数据领跑全场。ONG 成功晋级季后赛，将进入败者组继续征程。T1 速胜 DetonatioN FocusMe，保持晋级压力对于 T1 而言，这很可能是他们 2026 赛季的最后一场比赛，但他们成功击败了状态火热的 DFM，保住了通往上海全球冠军赛的希望。

H | 第二赛段对于 T1 来说起伏不定，选手轮换、位置变动和指挥更迭让这支队伍陷入低谷。

I | 目前在冠军积分榜上位列 Nongshim 之后，T1 的局势尚不明朗。DFM 在 2025 年末至 2026 年大部分时间里一直是 Pacific 赛区的中坚力量，前一天刚以 26-7 的夸张比分（应为局分）战胜了 ZETA DIVISION。系列赛在 DFM 的选图 Ascent 上开打。DFM 在前一天曾以 13-4 大胜 ZETA，但面对 T1 时，他们的进攻受阻。T1 在防守端以 7-5 领先，随后在进攻端持续施压，以 13-7 拿下首图。在 Haven 上，T1 启用“夜露+霓虹”阵容，势如破竹。在拿下手枪局及后续两局后，T1 以 9-3 领先半场。

J | 下半场 T1 再拿手枪局，尽管 DFM 在后半程试图反扑，但在面对 T1 五人集结冲击 A 点的攻势下，DFM 无力回天。T1 的制胜瞬间。BuZz 是本系列赛的 MVP。在他回归原始决斗位后，打出了个人职业生涯的最佳表现之一，贡献了 43 次击杀和 1.46 的评分，而 Meiy 的 35 次击杀最终未能拯救 DFM。下一步随着 T1 和 ONG 的获胜，六支拥有韩国选手的队伍已经锁定了 Stage 2 的季后赛席位。根据直播公布的季后赛对阵表，ONG 和 T1 将从败者组开始，而入围赛胜者组的获胜队伍将进入胜者组并拥有复活机会。 Nongshim RedForce 将对阵 Paper Rex，争夺挑战 Gen.G 的资格；而 KIWOOM DRX 将对阵 Global Esports，获胜者将挑战 VARREL。季后赛将于周三开始，赛程如下：Paper Rex vs. Nongshim RedForce (胜者组第一轮)Global Esports vs. KIWOOM DRX (胜者组第一轮)Gen.G vs. PRX/NS (胜者组半决赛)VARREL vs. GE/KRX (胜者组半决赛)。